What, according to the Supreme Court, constitutes “the basic structure” of our constitution? Name a couple of important judgments of the Supreme Court on this issue.

by

What Constitutes the “Basic Structure” of the Indian Constitution?

Introduction:

The concept of “basic structure” of the Indian Constitution is a cornerstone of Indian constitutional law. It emerged from judicial pronouncements to safeguard the fundamental tenets of the Constitution against amendments that would alter its core character. While the Constitution itself doesn’t explicitly define “basic structure,” the Supreme Court, through a series of landmark judgments, has shaped its understanding and application. This necessitates a factual and analytical approach to understand the Supreme Court’s evolving interpretation of this crucial concept.

Body:

1. Evolution of the “Basic Structure” Doctrine:

The doctrine of basic structure wasn’t explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. It was judicially evolved in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973). This case challenged the extent of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a majority judgment, held that while Parliament possesses the power to amend the Constitution, this power is not absolute. It cannot amend the “basic structure” of the Constitution. This ruling effectively placed a judicially imposed limitation on the amending power of Parliament.

2. Identifying the Basic Structure:

The Supreme Court has not provided an exhaustive list of what constitutes the basic structure. However, through various judgments, certain features have been consistently identified as integral to it. These include:

  • Supremacy of the Constitution: The Constitution’s position as the supreme law of the land, above all other laws, is a fundamental element.
  • Secularism: The principle of secularism, ensuring religious neutrality and freedom of religion, is considered a core component.
  • Federalism: The balance of power between the Union and the States, preserving the federal character of the Indian polity, is crucial.
  • Separation of Powers: The distinct roles of the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary, ensuring checks and balances, are essential.
  • Fundamental Rights: The fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens, forming the bedrock of individual liberties, are non-negotiable.
  • Judicial Review: The power of the judiciary to review legislative and executive actions for their constitutionality is a cornerstone of the basic structure.
  • Rule of Law: The principle of governance based on established laws and principles, ensuring equality before the law, is fundamental.
  • Democratic Republic: The essence of India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic is inviolable.

3. Important Supreme Court Judgments:

  • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): This case is the foundational judgment establishing the doctrine of basic structure. It laid down the principle that Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution through amendments.

  • Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980): This case further solidified the basic structure doctrine. The Court struck down certain amendments that curtailed the power of judicial review, emphasizing the importance of judicial independence as part of the basic structure.

4. Criticisms of the Basic Structure Doctrine:

The basic structure doctrine has faced criticism. Some argue that it’s an undemocratic limitation on the power of the elected Parliament, potentially leading to judicial overreach. Others contend that it lacks clarity and predictability, making it difficult to determine what constitutes the basic structure in specific cases.

Conclusion:

The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the “basic structure” doctrine has been crucial in safeguarding the core values and principles of the Indian Constitution. While the exact components of the basic structure remain open to interpretation and refinement through future judgments, the doctrine has successfully prevented significant alterations that would have fundamentally altered the character of the Indian polity. The ongoing debate highlights the delicate balance between parliamentary sovereignty and judicial review in a democratic system. Moving forward, a transparent and consistent approach by the judiciary in applying the basic structure doctrine is crucial to maintain public confidence and ensure the continued protection of fundamental constitutional values. This requires a continuous dialogue between the judiciary and the legislature, fostering a collaborative approach to constitutional interpretation that upholds both democratic principles and the essential features of the Indian Constitution, ensuring its enduring relevance and safeguarding its core values for future generations.

APPSC GROUP 1 Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for APPSC GROUP 1 Prelims and APPSC GROUP 1 Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by APPSC GROUP 1 Notes are as follows:- For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––